Hands and Results
1 |
♠AK6
♥J
♦J8765
♣9854
|
Dlr: North Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3/2♣ 4♦ 3NT ♥6 ♠5 |
EW: 2♠ ♣4 ♦3 ♥5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.00 1.00 2N S +1 ♥7 3-Piazzoni-Sonne vs 10-Schneidewind-Lane
150 3.00 1.00 2N S +1 ♥3 4-Shapley-Chan vs 7-Lagodimos-Rake
150 3.00 1.00 1N N +2 ♥6 1-Bloomberg-Seltzer vs 6-Glass-Shaffer
130 0.50 3.50 4♦ S ♣A 8-Nimtz-Wetz vs 2-Riley-Caldwell
130 0.50 3.50 3♦ S +1 ♣K 5-Henning-Dempsey vs 9-Pyrz-Koscielski
|
2 |
♠AJ32
♥9642
♦76
♣AQ5
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ 2♠ ♥4 NT4 |
EW: 3♥ 1/3NT ♣5 ♦4 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 4♥ W -2 ♦7 3-Piazzoni-Sonne vs 10-Schneidewind-Lane
50 2.50 1.50 3♥ W -1 ♦7 4-Shapley-Chan vs 7-Lagodimos-Rake
50 2.50 1.50 3♥ W -1 ♦7 8-Nimtz-Wetz vs 2-Riley-Caldwell
110 1.00 3.00 1♥ W +1 ♦7 5-Henning-Dempsey vs 9-Pyrz-Koscielski
140 0.00 4.00 2♥ W +1 ♦7 1-Bloomberg-Seltzer vs 6-Glass-Shaffer
|
3 |
♠932
♥KQ62
♦K98
♣KJ8
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♥ ♦3/4 ♠0/4 NT0/5 |
EW: 3♦ 2♠ ♣3 ♥2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
800 4.00 0.00 5♦* E -3 ♥A 1-Bloomberg-Seltzer vs 6-Glass-Shaffer
500 3.00 1.00 3♠* W -2 ♠9 8-Nimtz-Wetz vs 2-Riley-Caldwell
420 2.00 2.00 4♥ S ♦3 4-Shapley-Chan vs 7-Lagodimos-Rake
130 1.00 3.00 4♣ S ♥J 5-Henning-Dempsey vs 9-Pyrz-Koscielski
100 0.00 4.00 4♥ N -2 ♠K 3-Piazzoni-Sonne vs 10-Schneidewind-Lane
|
4 |
♠A86
♥4
♦T98762
♣A92
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣5 ♥6 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 1♥ 1NT ♦4 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 2♦ N +1 ♠K 1-Bloomberg-Seltzer vs 6-Glass-Shaffer
100 3.00 1.00 3♣ E -1 ♦J 4-Shapley-Chan vs 7-Lagodimos-Rake
90 1.50 2.50 2♣ E ♥A 3-Piazzoni-Sonne vs 10-Schneidewind-Lane
90 1.50 2.50 2♣ E ♥A 5-Henning-Dempsey vs 9-Pyrz-Koscielski
120 0.00 4.00 1N W +1 ♦T 8-Nimtz-Wetz vs 2-Riley-Caldwell
|
5 |
♠K
♥AJ43
♦Q743
♣T632
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦6 ♥2 ♠5 NT2 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ 5♥ 1♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.00 0.00 3♥ W +1 ♠K 5-Henning-Dempsey vs 9-Pyrz-Koscielski
420 3.00 1.00 4♥ W ♦3 1-Bloomberg-Seltzer vs 6-Glass-Shaffer
430 1.50 2.50 3N E +1 ♠5 3-Piazzoni-Sonne vs 10-Schneidewind-Lane
430 1.50 2.50 3N E +1 ♠3 4-Shapley-Chan vs 7-Lagodimos-Rake
450 0.00 4.00 4♥ W +1 ♠K 8-Nimtz-Wetz vs 2-Riley-Caldwell
|
6 |
♠A
♥J7532
♦KQ83
♣T63
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ 5♥ 3♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦4 ♥2 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 4.00 0.00 4♥ N ♦J 2-Riley-Caldwell vs 7-Lagodimos-Rake
400 3.00 1.00 3N S ♣7 1-Bloomberg-Seltzer vs 10-Schneidewind-Lane
170 2.00 2.00 3♥ N +1 ♦J 5-Henning-Dempsey vs 8-Nimtz-Wetz
140 0.50 3.50 2♠ S +1 ♦9 4-Shapley-Chan vs 6-Glass-Shaffer
140 0.50 3.50 2♠ S +1 ♣7 9-Pyrz-Koscielski vs 3-Piazzoni-Sonne
|
7 |
♠Q7
♥T92
♦8543
♣QJT5
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣5 ♦4/5 ♠3 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 4♠ 2NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.00 0.00 2♥ S +2 ♠3 4-Shapley-Chan vs 6-Glass-Shaffer
100 3.00 1.00 1N N -1 ♠4 1-Bloomberg-Seltzer vs 10-Schneidewind-Lane
120 2.00 2.00 1N E +1 ♥5 2-Riley-Caldwell vs 7-Lagodimos-Rake
140 0.50 3.50 2♠ W +1 ♥T 5-Henning-Dempsey vs 8-Nimtz-Wetz
140 0.50 3.50 1♠ W +2 ♥2 9-Pyrz-Koscielski vs 3-Piazzoni-Sonne
|
8 |
♠QJ84
♥-
♦KJT874
♣QJ5
|
Dlr: West Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦5 ♥3 ♠5 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 2♦ 4♥ 1♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 4♥ W -1 ♣Q 9-Pyrz-Koscielski vs 3-Piazzoni-Sonne
170 3.00 1.00 3♥ W +1 ♠Q 4-Shapley-Chan vs 6-Glass-Shaffer
300 2.00 2.00 4♠* N -2 ♣A 2-Riley-Caldwell vs 7-Lagodimos-Rake
420 1.00 3.00 4♥ E ♦3 5-Henning-Dempsey vs 8-Nimtz-Wetz
1100 0.00 4.00 5♦* N -5 1-Bloomberg-Seltzer vs 10-Schneidewind-Lane
|
9 |
♠A72
♥AJT
♦K3
♣KQT73
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/3♣ 1♦ 3♥ 3♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦6 ♥4 ♠4 NT3/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1100 3.88 0.13 2♣* E -4 ♠7 4-Shapley-Chan vs 6-Glass-Shaffer
400 2.63 1.38 3N N ♣4 1-Bloomberg-Seltzer vs 10-Schneidewind-Lane
50 0.75 3.25 3N N -1 ♣4 9-Pyrz-Koscielski vs 3-Piazzoni-Sonne
50 0.75 3.25 4♥ S -1 ♠8 5-Henning-Dempsey vs 8-Nimtz-Wetz
|
10 |
♠KT982
♥AK4
♦K874
♣6
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3/4♦ 1♥ 2♠ -/1NT NT6/7 |
EW: ♣6 ♦3 ♥5 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.88 0.13 3♦ N +2 ♥3 4-Shapley-Chan vs 6-Glass-Shaffer
110 2.00 2.00 2♠ N ♥2 1-Bloomberg-Seltzer vs 10-Schneidewind-Lane
110 2.00 2.00 2♦ N +1 ♣7 9-Pyrz-Koscielski vs 3-Piazzoni-Sonne
200 0.13 3.88 3N N -2 ♥2 5-Henning-Dempsey vs 8-Nimtz-Wetz
|
11 |
♠AT832
♥K765
♦QJ75
♣-
|
Dlr: South Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣0 ♦6 ♥2 NT1 |
EW: 6♣ 4♥ 6NT ♦6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 4.00 0.00 1♣ W +3 ♦Q 2-Riley-Caldwell vs 6-Glass-Shaffer
400 3.00 1.00 5♣ E ♠A 1-Bloomberg-Seltzer vs 9-Pyrz-Koscielski
420 2.00 2.00 4♥ E ♠5 5-Henning-Dempsey vs 7-Lagodimos-Rake
490 1.00 3.00 3N E +3 ♠5 10-Schneidewind-Lane vs 4-Shapley-Chan
920 0.00 4.00 6♣ W ♠A 3-Piazzoni-Sonne vs 8-Nimtz-Wetz
|
12 |
♠42
♥T96432
♦Q5
♣Q84
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦3 ♥4 ♠0 NT1 |
EW: 5♣ 4♦ 3♥ 7♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 6N W -2 ♦2 1-Bloomberg-Seltzer vs 9-Pyrz-Koscielski
480 3.00 1.00 4♠ E +2 ♥J 2-Riley-Caldwell vs 6-Glass-Shaffer
980 1.00 3.00 6♠ W ♥T 5-Henning-Dempsey vs 7-Lagodimos-Rake
980 1.00 3.00 6♠ E ♠6 3-Piazzoni-Sonne vs 8-Nimtz-Wetz
980 1.00 3.00 6♠ E ♥J 10-Schneidewind-Lane vs 4-Shapley-Chan
|
13 |
♠K
♥J8742
♦T543
♣643
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦2 ♥4 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 5♦ 2♥ 5♠ 5NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.00 0.00 2♠ E +2 ♣A 2-Riley-Caldwell vs 6-Glass-Shaffer
200 3.00 1.00 2♠ E +3 ♦J 5-Henning-Dempsey vs 7-Lagodimos-Rake
620 1.50 2.50 4♠ E ♦J 3-Piazzoni-Sonne vs 8-Nimtz-Wetz
620 1.50 2.50 4♥ W ♣A 10-Schneidewind-Lane vs 4-Shapley-Chan
650 0.00 4.00 4♠ W +1 ♠5 1-Bloomberg-Seltzer vs 9-Pyrz-Koscielski
|
14 |
♠KT97
♥86
♦Q96
♣8763
|
Dlr: East Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♠ 1/-NT ♦6 ♥5 NT7/6 |
EW: 1♦ 2♥ ♣4 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
180 4.00 0.00 1N N +3 ♦T 1-Bloomberg-Seltzer vs 9-Pyrz-Koscielski
150 3.00 1.00 1N S +2 ♠3 3-Piazzoni-Sonne vs 8-Nimtz-Wetz
120 2.00 2.00 2N S ♠3 2-Riley-Caldwell vs 6-Glass-Shaffer
110 1.00 3.00 3♣ N ♥5 10-Schneidewind-Lane vs 4-Shapley-Chan
50 0.00 4.00 3♥ E -1 ♠J 5-Henning-Dempsey vs 7-Lagodimos-Rake
|
15 |
♠53
♥AK942
♦853
♣A43
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5/6♦ 5♥ 5NT ♣5 ♠6 |
EW: 2♣ 1♠ ♦1 ♥2 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
690 4.00 0.00 3N S +3 ♠T 3-Piazzoni-Sonne vs 8-Nimtz-Wetz
650 3.00 1.00 4♥ N +1 ♣Q 2-Riley-Caldwell vs 6-Glass-Shaffer
620 1.50 2.50 5♦ S +1 ♠T 1-Bloomberg-Seltzer vs 9-Pyrz-Koscielski
620 1.50 2.50 5♦ S +1 ♠T 10-Schneidewind-Lane vs 4-Shapley-Chan
300 0.00 4.00 4♠* E -2 ♦A 5-Henning-Dempsey vs 7-Lagodimos-Rake
|
16 |
♠53
♥K42
♦KJT97
♣T82
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦4 ♥1 ♠0 NT0 |
EW: 5♣ 3♦ 5♥ 7♠ 7NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
190 4.00 0.00 3♣ E +4 ♥9 6-Glass-Shaffer vs 5-Henning-Dempsey
640 3.00 1.00 5♣ W +2 ♦3 4-Shapley-Chan vs 9-Pyrz-Koscielski
720 2.00 2.00 3N E +4 ♠J 3-Piazzoni-Sonne vs 7-Lagodimos-Rake
1460 1.00 3.00 6♠ W +1 ♣8 2-Riley-Caldwell vs 10-Schneidewind-Lane
1470 0.00 4.00 6N E +1 1-Bloomberg-Seltzer vs 8-Nimtz-Wetz
|
17 |
♠AQT9
♥J
♦AK74
♣QJ76
|
Dlr: North Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♥ 2♠ 4NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣2/3 ♥3 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 3.00 1.00 3N N +1 ♦Q 3-Piazzoni-Sonne vs 7-Lagodimos-Rake
430 3.00 1.00 3N N +1 ♦Q 4-Shapley-Chan vs 9-Pyrz-Koscielski
430 3.00 1.00 3N N +1 ♦Q 6-Glass-Shaffer vs 5-Henning-Dempsey
50 1.00 3.00 4♥ N -1 1-Bloomberg-Seltzer vs 8-Nimtz-Wetz
150 0.00 4.00 4♥ S -3 ♦6 2-Riley-Caldwell vs 10-Schneidewind-Lane
|
18 |
♠J8
♥J987652
♦A7
♣J6
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♥ 4NT ♣4/3 ♦5 ♠4 |
EW: 3♣ 2♦ 3♠ ♥1 NT2/1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
790 4.00 0.00 4♥* N ♠A 1-Bloomberg-Seltzer vs 8-Nimtz-Wetz
650 3.00 1.00 4♥ N +1 ♦5 4-Shapley-Chan vs 9-Pyrz-Koscielski
200 2.00 2.00 3♥ N +2 ♦6 6-Glass-Shaffer vs 5-Henning-Dempsey
100 1.00 3.00 3♠* E -1 ♥4 2-Riley-Caldwell vs 10-Schneidewind-Lane
50 0.00 4.00 3♠ E -1 ♥A 3-Piazzoni-Sonne vs 7-Lagodimos-Rake
|
19 |
♠Q652
♥T4
♦KJ542
♣Q2
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3/2♣ 3/2♦ 4/3♥ 2♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣3/4 ♦4 ♥3 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.00 0.00 2♥ S +2 ♦A 4-Shapley-Chan vs 9-Pyrz-Koscielski
110 3.00 1.00 2♥ S ♦A 6-Glass-Shaffer vs 5-Henning-Dempsey
90 2.00 2.00 1N N ♠9 1-Bloomberg-Seltzer vs 8-Nimtz-Wetz
50 1.00 3.00 4♥ S -1 ♠4 2-Riley-Caldwell vs 10-Schneidewind-Lane
100 0.00 4.00 3N S -2 ♠7 3-Piazzoni-Sonne vs 7-Lagodimos-Rake
|
20 |
♠942
♥J94
♦73
♣AT653
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♠ ♦5 ♥4 NT6 |
EW: 2♦ 2♥ ♣5 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.50 0.50 2♠ S ♣9 4-Shapley-Chan vs 9-Pyrz-Koscielski
110 3.50 0.50 2♠ S ♣9 6-Glass-Shaffer vs 5-Henning-Dempsey
100 1.50 2.50 2♠ S -1 ♣9 1-Bloomberg-Seltzer vs 8-Nimtz-Wetz
100 1.50 2.50 2♣ N -1 ♥2 2-Riley-Caldwell vs 10-Schneidewind-Lane
140 0.00 4.00 3♥ W ♠9 3-Piazzoni-Sonne vs 7-Lagodimos-Rake
|
21 |
♠QT94
♥K973
♦T94
♣A8
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♠ ♦5 ♥5 NT5 |
EW: 1♦ 2♥ 1NT ♣6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 4♥ W -2 ♣A 5-Henning-Dempsey vs 10-Schneidewind-Lane
50 3.00 1.00 3♥ W -1 ♠4 2-Riley-Caldwell vs 9-Pyrz-Koscielski
90 2.00 2.00 1N W ♠4 7-Lagodimos-Rake vs 1-Bloomberg-Seltzer
110 1.00 3.00 2♥ W ♣A 3-Piazzoni-Sonne vs 6-Glass-Shaffer
120 0.00 4.00 1N W +1 ♥3 4-Shapley-Chan vs 8-Nimtz-Wetz
|
22 |
♠9642
♥T93
♦Q83
♣Q52
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦3 ♥5 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 4♦ 1♥ 1NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 3N W -2 ♠2 5-Henning-Dempsey vs 10-Schneidewind-Lane
50 3.00 1.00 1N S -1 ♣9 3-Piazzoni-Sonne vs 6-Glass-Shaffer
100 2.00 2.00 1♣ S -2 ♥3 2-Riley-Caldwell vs 9-Pyrz-Koscielski
110 1.00 3.00 3♦ W ♣2 7-Lagodimos-Rake vs 1-Bloomberg-Seltzer
130 0.00 4.00 2♦ E +2 ♠A 4-Shapley-Chan vs 8-Nimtz-Wetz
|
23 |
♠K986
♥JT4
♦K86
♣653
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦4 ♥6 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 3♦ 1♥ 1♠ 2NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.50 0.50 3N E -1 ♠T 2-Riley-Caldwell vs 9-Pyrz-Koscielski
100 3.50 0.50 2♥ W -1 ♣6 7-Lagodimos-Rake vs 1-Bloomberg-Seltzer
120 2.00 2.00 2N W ♠3 4-Shapley-Chan vs 8-Nimtz-Wetz
600 0.50 3.50 3N E ♣2 3-Piazzoni-Sonne vs 6-Glass-Shaffer
600 0.50 3.50 3N E ♣2 5-Henning-Dempsey vs 10-Schneidewind-Lane
|
24 |
♠AQ86
♥KQT82
♦62
♣AT
|
Dlr: West Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/1♦ 4♥ 5♠ 2NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦5 ♥3 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 4.00 0.00 4♠ S +2 7-Lagodimos-Rake vs 1-Bloomberg-Seltzer
460 3.00 1.00 3N S +2 ♦5 3-Piazzoni-Sonne vs 6-Glass-Shaffer
450 1.00 3.00 4♠ S +1 ♥A 5-Henning-Dempsey vs 10-Schneidewind-Lane
450 1.00 3.00 4♠ N +1 ♦K 2-Riley-Caldwell vs 9-Pyrz-Koscielski
450 1.00 3.00 4♠ N +1 ♣K 4-Shapley-Chan vs 8-Nimtz-Wetz
|
25 |
♠A3
♥AT875
♦K5
♣A942
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 4♦ 3/4♥ 5/6♠ 4/5NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦3 ♥3 ♠1 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 2.50 1.50 3N N +2 ♥9 2-Riley-Caldwell vs 9-Pyrz-Koscielski
460 2.50 1.50 3N N +2 ♦6 7-Lagodimos-Rake vs 1-Bloomberg-Seltzer
460 2.50 1.50 3N N +2 ♦4 3-Piazzoni-Sonne vs 6-Glass-Shaffer
460 2.50 1.50 3N N +2 ♦3 4-Shapley-Chan vs 8-Nimtz-Wetz
430 0.00 4.00 3N N +1 ♦4 5-Henning-Dempsey vs 10-Schneidewind-Lane
|